Dictionary Definition
Origen n : Greek philosopher and theologian who
reinterpreted Christian doctrine through the philosophy of
Neoplatonism; his work was later condemned as unorthodox
User Contributed Dictionary
Spanish
Noun
Extensive Definition
- For the 5th century Jewish physician from Alexandria with a similar name, see Adamantius.
Using his knowledge of Hebrew, he produced a
corrected Septuagint. He
wrote commentaries on all the books of the Bible. In Peri Archon
(First Principles), he articulated the first philosophical
exposition of Christian doctrine.
Etymology
His name, Ōrigénēs (), is a form of a classical Greek namehttp://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0057%3Aentry%3D%2375077. The initial part is uncertain (possibly from meaning the Egyptian god Horus or meaning "mountain"), and the second part is equivocal (from either meaning "kind, type" or meaning "to be born, give birth"). Thus, his name would mean "born of Horus" or, on the supposition of oros as the first part, the name could mean "born [brought forth, etc] from the mountain" or "like the mountain."Origen was also given the nickname Adamantios (,
from the negated root meaning "to tame"), which means
"unconquerable-" or "unbreakable one"http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0057%3Aentry%3D%231145.
Life
Early training
Origen was educated by his father, Leonides, who gave him a standard Hellenistic education, but also had him study the Christian Scriptures. In 202, Origen's father was killed in the outbreak of the persecution during the reign of Septimius Severus. Origen wished to follow in martyrdom, but was prevented only by his mother hiding his clothes. The death of Leonides left the family of nine impoverished when their property was confiscated. Origen, however, was taken under the protection of a woman of wealth and standing; but as her household already included a heretic named Paul, the strictly orthodox Origen seems to have remained with her only a short time.Since his father's teaching enabled him also to
give elementary instruction, he revived, in 203, the Catechetical
School of Alexandria, whose last teacher, Clement of Alexandria,
was apparently driven out by the persecution. But the persecution
still raged, and the young teacher unceasingly visited the
prisoners, attended the courts, and comforted the condemned,
himself preserved from harm as if by a miracle. His fame and the
number of his pupils increased rapidly, so that Bishop Demetrius
of Alexandria, made him restrict himself to instruction in
Christian doctrine alone.
Origen, to be entirely independent, sold his
library for a sum which netted him a daily income of 4 obols, on
which he lived by exercising the utmost frugality. Teaching
throughout the day, he devoted the greater part of the night to the
study of the Bible and lived a life of rigid asceticism. According
to some traditions, he carried this to such an extent that, fearing
that his position as a teacher of women as well as men might give
ground for scandal to the heathen, he followed Matthew
19:12 literally and castrated himself; this
action, if accurately reported, was likely partly influenced, too,
by his belief that the Christian must follow the words of his
Master without reserve. If the tradition of his self-castration is
accurate, however, he certainly judged differently in later life
concerning such an extreme act. The historical accuracy of this
supposed castration has been doubted by some scholars. It has been
postulated that this story was circulated by Origen's rivals in an
effort to lessen his importance or to otherwise sully his
reputation.
During the reign of emperor Caracalla, about
211-212, Origen paid a brief visit to Rome, but the relative
laxity during the pontificate of Zephyrinus
seems to have disillusioned him, and on his return to Alexandria he
resumed his teaching with zeal increased by the contrast. But the
school had far outgrown the strength of a single man; the
catechumens pressed eagerly for elementary instruction, and the
baptized sought for interpretation of the Bible. Under these
circumstances, Origen entrusted the teaching of the catechumens to
Heraclas,
the brother of the martyr Plutarch, his
first pupil.
His own interests became more and more centered
in exegesis, and he
accordingly studied Hebrew,
though there is no certain knowledge concerning his instructor in
that language. From about this period (212-213) dates Origen's
acquaintance with Ambrose
of Alexandria, whom he was instrumental in converting from
Valentianism to
orthodoxy. Later (about 218) Ambrose, a man of wealth, made a
formal agreement with Origen to promulgate his writings, and all
the subsequent works of Origen (except his sermons, which were not
expressly prepared for publication) were dedicated to
Ambrose.
In 213 or 214, Origen visited Arabia at the
request of the prefect, who wished to have an interview with him;
and Origen accordingly spent a brief time in Petra, after which he
returned to Alexandria. In the following year, a popular uprising
at Alexandria caused Caracalla to let his soldiers plunder the
city, shut the schools, and expel all foreigners. The latter
measure caused Ambrose to take refuge in Caesarea, where he seems
to have made his permanent home; and Origen, who felt that the
turmoil hindered his activity as a teacher and imperilled his
safety, left Egypt, apparently going with Ambrose to Caesarea,
where he spent some time. Here, in conformity with local usage
based on Jewish custom, Origen, though not ordained, preached and
interpreted the Scriptures at the request of the bishops Alexander
of Jerusalem and Theoctistus of Caesarea. When, however, the
confusion in Alexandria subsided, Demetrius recalled Origen,
probably in 216.
Of Origen's activity during the next decade
little is known, but it was obviously devoted to teaching and
writing. The latter was rendered the more easy for him by Ambrose,
who provided him with more than seven stenographers to take
dictation in relays, as many scribes to prepare long-hand copies,
and a number of girls to multiply the copies. At the request of
Ambrose, he now began a huge commentary on the Bible, beginning
with John, and continuing with Genesis, Psalms 1-25, and
Lamentations,
besides brief exegeses of selected texts (forming the ten books of
his Stromateis), two books on the resurrection, and the work
On First Principles.
Conflict with Demetrius and removal to Caesarea
About 230, Origen entered on the fateful journey which was to compel him to give up his work at Alexandria and embittered the next years of his life. Sent to Greece on some ecclesiastical mission, he paid a visit to Caesarea, where he was heartily welcomed and was ordained a priest, that no further cause for criticism might be given Demetrius, who had strongly disapproved his preaching before ordination while at Caesarea. But Demetrius, taking this well-meant act as an infringement of his rights, was furious, for not only was Origen under his jurisdiction, but, if Eastern sources may be believed, Demetrius had been the first to introduce episcopal ordination in Egypt. The metropolitan accordingly convened a synod of bishops and presbyters which banished Origen from Alexandria, while a second synod declared his ordination invalid.Origen accordingly fled from Alexandria in 231,
and made his permanent home in Caesarea. A series of attacks on him
seems to have emanated from Alexandria, whether for his self-castration
(a capital crime in Roman law) or for alleged heterodoxy is unknown; but at
all events these fulminations were heeded only at Rome, while
Palestine, Phoenicia, Arabia, and Achaia paid no attention to
them.
At Alexandria Heraclas became head of Origen's
school, and shortly afterward, on the death of Demetrius, was
consecrated bishop. At Caesarea Origen was joyfully received, and
was also the guest of Firmilian, bishop of Caesarea in Cappadocia,
and of the empress-dowager, Julia
Mamaea, at Antioch. The former
also visited him at Caesarea, where Origen, deeply loved by his
pupils, preached and taught dialectics, physics, ethics, and metaphysics; thus laying his
foundation for the crowning theme of theology.
He accordingly sought to set forth all the
science of the time from
the Christian point of view, and to elevate Christianity to a
theory of the Universe
compatible with Hellenism. In 235, with the accession of Maximinus
Thrax, a persecution raged; and for two years Origen is said,
though on somewhat doubtful authority, to have remained concealed
in the house of a certain Juliana in Casarea of Cappadocia.
Little is known of the last twenty years of
Origen's life. He preached regularly on Wednesdays and Fridays, and
later daily. He evidently, however, developed an extraordinary
literary productivity, broken by occasional journeys; one of which,
to Athens during some unknown year, was of sufficient length to
allow him time for research.
After his return from Athens, he succeeded in
converting Beryllus, bishop
of Bostra, from his adoptionistic (i.e., belief that Jesus was born
human and only became divine after his baptism) views to the
Orthodox faith; yet in these very years (about 240) probably
occurred the attacks on Origen's own orthodoxy which compelled him
to defend himself in writing to Pope Fabian
and many bishops. Neither the source nor the object of these
attacks is known, though the latter may have been connected with
Novatianism (a
strict refusal to accept Christians who had denied their faith
under persecution).
After his conversion of Beryllus, however, his
aid was frequently invoked against heresies. Thus, when the
doctrine was promulgated in Arabia that the soul died and decayed
with the body, being restored to life only at the resurrection (see
soul
sleep), appeal was made to Origen, who journeyed to Arabia, and
by his preaching reclaimed the erring.
In 250 persecutions of the Church broke out anew,
and this time Origen did not escape. He was tortured, pilloried,
and bound hand and foot to the block for days without yielding.
Though he did not die while being tortured, he died within two
years of injuries sustained. Had he died during, he would have been
declared a martyr, something that he would have greatly desired. A
later legend, recounted by Jerome (De
viris illustribus, chapter 54) and numerous itineraries place
his death and burial at Tyre, but
to this little value can be attached.
Works
Exegetical writings
According to Epiphanius, Origen wrote about 6,000 works (i.e., rolls or chapters). A list was given by Eusebius in his lost Life of Pamphilus, which was apparently known to Jerome. These fall into four classes: textual criticism; exegesis; systematic, practical, and apologetic theology; and letters; besides certain spurious works.By far the most important work of Origen on
textual criticism was the Hexapla, a
comparative study of various translations of the Old
Testament.
The full text of the Hexapla is no longer extant.
Some portions were discovered in Milan indicating that
at least some individual parts existed much longer than was
previously thought. The Hexapla has been referred to by later
manuscripts and authors, and represented the precursor to the
parallel bible.
The Tetrapla was an abbreviation of the Hexapla
in which Origen placed only the translations (Aquila, Symmachus,
Theodotion, and the Septuagint) in
parallels.
He was likewise keenly conscious of the textual
difficulties in the manuscripts of the New Testament, although he
never wrote definitely on this subject. In his exegetical writings
he frequently alludes to the variant readings, but his habit of
making rough citations in his dictation, the verification being
left to the scribes, renders it impossible to deduce his text from
his commentaries. Eusebius in Ecclesiastical History 6.25.7
strongly implies Origen disputed the authenticity of the Letters of
Paul when he wrote that Paul did not write to all the churches that
he taught and even to the ones he wrote he only sent a few
lines.
The exegetical writings of Origen fall into three
classes:
- scholia, or brief summaries of the meaning of difficult passages
- homilies
- "books", or commentaries in the strict sense of the term.
Jerome states that there were scholia on
Leviticus, Psalms i.-xv., Ecclesiastes, Isaiah, and part of John.
The Stromateis were of a similar character, and the margin of Codex
Athous Laura, 184, contains citations from this work on Rom. 9:23;
I Cor. 6:14, 7:31, 34, 9:20-21, 10:9, besides a few other
fragments.
Homilies on almost the entire Bible were prepared
by Origen, these being taken down after his sixtieth year as he
preached. It is not improbable that Origen gave no attention to
supervising the publication of his homilies, for only by such a
hypothesis can the numerous evidences of carelessness in diction be
explained. The exegesis of the homilies was simpler than that of
the scientific commentaries, but nevertheless demanded no mean
degree of intelligence from the auditor. Origen's chief aim was the
practical exposition of the text, verse by verse; and while in such
barren books as Leviticus and Numbers he sought to allegorize, the
wealth of material in the prophets seldom rendered it necessary for
him to seek meanings deeper than the surface afforded. Whether the
sermons were delivered in series, or the homilies on a single book
were collected from various series, is unknown. The homilies
preserved are on Genesis (17), Exodus (13), Leviticus (18), Numbers
(28), Joshua (16), Judges (9), I Sam. (2), Psalms xxxvi-xxviii (9),
Canticles (2), Isaiah (9), Jeremiah (7 Greek, 2 Latin, 12 Greek and
Latin), Ezekiel (14), and
Luke (39).
Extant commentaries of Origen
The object of Origen's commentaries was to give an exegesis that discriminated strictly against the incidental, unimportant historical significance, in favour of the deeper, hidden, spiritual truth. At the same time, he neglected neither philological nor geographical, historical nor antiquarian material, to all of which he devoted numerous excursuses.In his commentary on John he constantly
considered the exegesis of the Valentinian Heracleon (probably at
the instance of Ambrose), and in many other places he implied or
expressly cited Gnostic views and refuted them.
Unfortunately, only meagre fragments of the
commentaries have survived. Besides the citations in the
Philocalia, which include fragments of the third book of the
commentary on Genesis, Ps. i, iv.1, the small commentary on
Canticles, and the second book of the large commentary on the same,
the twentieth book of the commentary on Ezekiel, and the commentary
on Hosea, and of the commentary on John, only books i, ii, x, xiii,
xx, xxviii, xxxii, and a fragment of xix. have been preserved. The
commentary on Romans is extant only in the abbreviated version of
Rufinus, and the eight books preserved of the commentary on Matthew
likewise seem to be either a brief reworking or a rough
outline.
Codex
Vaticanus, 1215, gives the division of the twenty-five books of
the commentary on Ezekiel, and part of the arrangement of the
commentary on Isaiah (beginnings of books VI, VIII, XVI; book X
extends from Isa. viii.1 to ix.7; XI from ix.8, to x.11; XII, from
x.12 to x.23; XIII from x.24 to xi.9; XIV from xi.10 to xii.6; XV
from xiii.1 to xiii.16; XXI from xix.1 to xix.17; XXII from xix.18
to xx.6; XXIII from xxi.1 to xxi.17; XXIV from xxii.1 to xxii.25;
XXV from xxiii.1 to xxiii.18; XXVI from xxiv.1 to xxv.12; XXVII
from xxvi.1 to xxvi.15; XXVIII from xxvi.16 to xxvii.11a; XXIX from
xxvii.11b to xxviii.29; and XXX treats of xxix.1 sqq.).
The Codex Athous Laura, 184, in like manner,
gives the division of the fifteen books of the commentary on Romans
(except XI and XII) and of the five books on Galatians, as well as
the extent of the commentaries on Philippians and Corinthians
(Romans I from 1:1 to 1:7; II from 1:8 to 1:25; III from 1:26 to
2:11; IV from 2:12 to 3:15; V from 3:16 to 3:31; VI from 4:1 to
5:7; VII from 5:8 to 5:16; VIII from 5:17 to 6:15; IX from 6:16 to
8:8; X from 8:9 to 8:39; XIII from 11:13 to 12:15; XIV from 12:16
to 14:10; XV from 14:11 to the end; Galatians I from 1:1 to 2:2; II
from 2:3 to 3:4; III from 3:5 to 4:5; IV from 4:6 to 5:5; and V
from 5:6 to 6:18; the commentary on Philippians extended to 4:1;
and on Ephesians to 4:13).
Dogmatic, practical, and apologetic writings
Among the systematic, practical, and apologetic writings of Origen, mention should first be made of his work On First Principles, perhaps written for his more advanced pupils at Alexandria and probably composed between 212 and 215. It is extant only in the free translation of Rufinus, except for fragments of the third and fourth books preserved in the Philokalia, and smaller citations in Justinian's letter to Mennas.In the first book the author considers God, the Logos, the Holy
Ghost, reason, and the angels; in the second the world and man
(including the incarnation of the Logos, the soul, free will, and
eschatology); in the third, the doctrine of sin and redemption; and
in the fourth, the Scriptures; the whole being concluded with a
résumé of the entire system. The work is noteworthy as the first
endeavor to present Christianity as a complete theory of the
universe, and was designed to remove the difficulties felt by many
Christians concerning the essential bases of their faith.
Earlier in date than this treatise were the two
books on the resurrection (now lost, a fate which has also befallen
two dialogues on the same theme) dedicated to Ambrose. After his
removal to Caesarea, Origen wrote the works, still extant, On
Prayer, On Martyrdom, and Against
Celsus. The first of these was written shortly before 235 (or
possibly before 230), and, after an introduction on the object,
necessity, and advantage of prayer, ends with an exegesis of
the Lord's Prayer, concluding with remarks on the position, place,
and attitude to be assumed during prayer, as well as on the classes
of prayer.
The persecution of Maximinus was the occasion of
the composition of the On Martyrdom, which is preserved in the
Exhortation to Martyrdom. In it, Origen warns against any trifling
with idolatry and emphasizes the duty of suffering martyrdom
manfully; while in the second part he explains the meaning of
martyrdom. The eight books against Celsus, Contra
Celsum were written in 248 in reply to the polemic of the pagan
philosopher against Christianity.
Eusebius had a
collection of more than one hundred letters of Origen (Hist. eccl.,
VI, xxxvi.3; Eng. transl. NPNF, 2 ser. i.278-279), and the list of
Jerome speaks of several books of his epistles. Except for a few
fragments, only a short letter to Gregory
Thaumaturgus and the epistle to Sextus
Julius Africanus (defending the authenticity of the Greek
additions to the book of Daniel) have been preserved.
For forgeries of the writings of Origen made in
his lifetime cf. Rufinus, De adulteratione librorum Origenis. The
Dialogus de recta in Deum fide, the Philosophumena
of Hippolytus
of Rome, and the Commentary on Job by Julian
of Halicarnassus have also been ascribed to him.
Views
Philosophical and religious
Origen, trained in the school of Clement and by his father, was essentially a Platonist with occasional traces of Stoic philosophy. He was thus a pronounced idealist, regarding all things temporal and material as insignificant and indifferent, the only real and eternal things being comprised in the idea. He therefore regards as the purely ideal center of this spiritual and eternal world, God, the pure reason, whose creative powers call into being the world with matter as the necessary substratum.Likewise Platonic is the
doctrine that those spirits capable of knowing supreme reason, but
imprisoned in the body in this world, will rise after death to
divinity, being purified by fire. In his attempt to amalgamate the
system evolved by Greek thought with Christianity, Origen found his
predecessors in the Platonizing Philo
of Alexandria and even in the Gnostics. His
exegesis does not differ generally from that of Heracleon, but in
the canon of the New
Testament and in the tradition of the Church, Origen possessed
a check which kept him from the excesses of Gnostic exegesis.
He was, indeed, a rigid adherent of the Bible,
making no statement without adducing some Scriptural basis. To him
the Bible was divinely inspired, as was proved both by the
fulfilment of prophecy
and by the immediate impression which the Scriptures made on those
who read them. Since the divine Logos spoke in the Scriptures, they
were an organic whole and on every occasion he combatted the
Gnostic tenet of the inferiority of the Old Testament.
In his exegesis, Origen sought to discover the
deeper meaning implied in the Scriptures. One of his chief methods
was the translation of proper names, which enabled him, like Philo,
to find a deep meaning even in every event of history (see hermeneutics), but at the
same time he insisted on an exact grammatical interpretation of the
text as the basis of all exegesis.
A strict adherent of the Church, Origen yet
distinguished sharply between the ideal and the empirical Church,
representing "a double church of men and angels", or, in Platonic
phraseology, the lower church and its celestial ideal. The ideal
Church alone was the Church of Christ, scattered over all the
earth; the other provided also a shelter for sinners. Holding that
the Church, as being in possession of the mysteries, affords the
only means of salvation, he was indifferent to her external
organization, although he spoke sometimes of the office-bearers as
the pillars of the Church, and of their heavy duties and
responsibilities.
More important to him was the idea borrowed from
Plato of the grand division between the great human multitude,
capable of sensual vision only, and those who know how to
comprehend the hidden meaning of Scripture and the diverse
mysteries, church organization being for the former only.
It is doubtful whether Origen possessed an
obligatory creed; at any rate, such a confession of faith was not a
norm like the inspired word of Scripture. The reason, illumined by
the divine Logos, which is able to search the secret depths of the
divine nature, remains as the only source of knowledge.
Theological and dogmatic
Origen's conception of God is apophatic-- God is a perfect unity, invisible and incorporeal, transcending all things material, and therefore inconceivable and incomprehensible. He is likewise unchangeable, and transcends space and time. But his power is limited by his goodness, justice, and wisdom; and, though entirely free from necessity, his goodness and omnipotence constrained him to reveal himself.This revelation, the external self-emanation of
God, is expressed by Origen in various ways, the Logos being only
one of many. Revelation was the first creation of God (cf. Prov.
viii. 22), in order to afford creative mediation between God and
the world, such mediation being necessary, because God, as
changeless unity, could not be the source of a multitudinous
creation.
The Logos is the rational creative principle that
permeates the universe. Since God eternally manifests himself, the
Logos is likewise eternal. He forms a bridge between the created
and uncreated, and only through him, as the visible representative
of divine wisdom, can the inconceivable and incorporeal God be
known. Creation came into existence only through the Logos, and
God's nearest approach to the world is the command to create. While
the Logos is substantially a unity, he comprehends a multiplicity
of concepts, so that Origen terms him, in Platonic fashion,
"essence of essences" and "idea of ideas".
The defense of the unity of God against the
Gnostics led Origen to maintain the subordination of the Logos to
God, and the doctrine of the eternal generation is later. Origen
distinctly emphasised the independence of the Logos as well as the
distinction from the being and substance of God. The term "of the
same substance with the Father" was not employed. He is merely an
image, a reflex not to be compared with God; as one among other
"gods", of course first in rank.
The Logos doctrine and cosmology
The activity of the Logos was conceived by Origen in Platonic fashion, as the world soul, wherein God manifested his omnipotence. His first creative act was the divine spirit, as an independent existence; and partial reflexes of the Logos were the created rational beings, who, as they had to revert to the perfect God as their background, must likewise be perfect; yet their perfection, unlike in kind with that of God, the Logos, and the divine spirit, had to be attained. The freedom of the will is an essential fact of the reason, notwithstanding the foreknowledge of God. The Logos, eternally creative, forms an endless series of finite, comprehensible worlds, which are mutually alternative. Combining the Stoic doctrine of a universe without beginning with the Biblical doctrine of the beginning and the end of the world, he conceived of the visible world as the stages of an eternal cosmic process, affording also an explanation of the diversity of human fortunes, rewards, and punishments. The material world, which at first had no place in this eternal spiritual progression, was due to the fall of the spirits from God, the first being the serpent, who was imprisoned in matter and body. The ultimate aim of God in the creation of matter out of nothing was not punishment, but the upraising of the fallen spirits. Man's accidental being is rooted in transitory matter, but his higher nature is formed in the image of the Creator. The soul is divided into the rational and the irrational, the latter being material and transitory, while the former, incorporeal and immaterial, possesses freedom of the will and the power to reascend to purer life. The strong ethical import of this cosmic process can not remain unnoticed. The return to original being through divine reason is the object of the entire cosmic process. Through the worlds which follow each other in eternal succession, the spirits are able to return to Paradise. God so ordered the universe that all individual acts work together toward one cosmic end which culminates in himself. Likewise as to Origen's anthropology, man conceived in the image of God is able by imitating God in good works to become like God, if he first recognizes his own weakness and trusts all to the divine goodness. He is aided by guardian angels, but more especially by the Logos who operates through saints and prophets in proportion to the constitution of these and man's capacity.Christology
The culmination of this gradual revelation is the universal revelation of Christ. In Christ, God, hitherto manifest only as the Lord, appeared as the Father. The incarnation of the Logos, moreover, was necessary since otherwise he would not be intelligible to sensual man; but the indwelling of the Logos remained a mystery, which could be represented only by the analogy of his indwelling in the saints; nor could Origen fully explain it. He speaks of a "remarkable body", and in his opinion that the mortal body of Jesus was transformed by God into an ethereal and divine body, Origen approximated the Docetism that he otherwise abhorred. His concept of the soul of Jesus is likewise uncertain and wavering. He proposes the question whether it was not originally perfect with God but, emanating from him, at his command assumed a material body. As he conceived matter as merely the universal limit of created spirits, so would it be impossible to state in what form the two were combined. He dismissed the solution by referring it to the mystery of the divine governance of the universe. More logically did he declare the material nature of the world to be merely an episode in the spiritual process of development, whose end should be the annihilation of all matter and return to God, who should again be all in all. The doctrine of the resurrection of the body he upholds by the explanation that the Logos maintains the unity of man's existence by ever changing his body into new forms, thus preserving the unity and identity of personality in harmony with the tenet of an endless cosmic process. Origen's concept of the Logos allowed him to make no definite statement on the redemptive work of Jesus. Since sin was ultimately only negative as a lack of pure knowledge, the activity of Jesus was essentially example and instruction, and his human life was only incidental as contrasted with the immanent cosmic activity of the Logos. Origen regarded the death of Jesus as a sacrifice, paralleling it with other cases of self-sacrifice for the general good. On this, Origen's accord with the teachings of the Church was merely superficial.Eschatology
His idealizing tendency to consider the spiritual alone as real, fundamental to his entire system, led him to combat the "rude" or "crude" Chiliasm (see Christian eschatology) of a sensual beyond. He denied the literal resurrection of physical bodies. Yet he constrained himself from breaking entirely with the distinct celestial hopes and representations of Paradise prevalent in the Church. He represents a progressive purification of souls, until, cleansed of all clouds of evil, they should know the truth and God as the Son knew him, see God face to face, and attain a full possession of the Holy Spirit and union with God. The means of attainment of this end were described by Origen in different ways, the most important of which was his Platonic concept of a purifying fire which should cleanse the world of evil and thus lead to cosmic renovation. By a further spiritualization Origen could call God himself this consuming fire. In proportion as the souls were freed from sin and ignorance, the material world was to pass away, until, after endless eons, at the final end, God should be all in all, and the worlds and spirits should return to a knowledge of God, in Greek this is called Apokatastasis.Character
In Origen the Christian Church had its first theologian in the highest sense of the term. Attaining the pinnacle of human speculation, his teaching was not merely theoretical, but was also imbued with an intense ethical power. To the multitude to whom his instruction was beyond grasp, he left mediating images and symbols, as well as the final goal of attainment. In Origen Christianity blended with the pagan philosophy in which lived the desire for truth and the longing after God. When he died, however, he left no pupil who could succeed him, nor was the church of his period able to become his heir, and thus, his knowledge was buried. Three centuries later his very name was stricken from the books of the Church; yet in the monasteries of the Greeks his influence still lived on, and the spiritual father of Greek monasticism was that same Origen at whose name the monks had shuddered.Origen's influence on the later Church
For quite some time, Origen was counted as one of the most important church fathers and his works were widely used in the Church. His exegetical method was standard of the School of Alexandria and the Origenists were an important party in the 4th century debates on Arianism.Basil the
Great and Gregory
Nazianzen, e.g., compiled in their first monastery the
Philokalia, a collection of Origen's work, though both of them did
neither adopt Origenism nor use the Alexandrian allegoric
exegesis.
Much later, Origen got into theological trouble
with the Church because of some extreme views adopted by his
followers, the Origenists, whose views were attributed to Origen.
In the course of this controversy, some of his other teachings came
up, which were not accepted by the general church consensus. Among
these were the preexistence of souls, universal
salvation and a hierarchical concept of the Trinity. These
teachings, and some of his followers' more extreme views, were
declared anathema by a
local council in Constantinople 545, and then an ecumenical council
(Fifth
Ecumenical Council) pronounced "15 anathemas" against Origen in
553.
The anathema against him in his person, declaring
him (among others) a heretic, reads as follows:
- If anyone does not anathematize Arius, Eunomius, Macedonius, Apollinaris, Nestorius, Eutyches and Origen, as well as their impious writings, as also all other heretics already condemned and anathematized by the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, and by the aforesaid four Holy Synods and [if anyone does not equally anathematize] all those who have held and hold or who in their impiety persist in holding to the end the same opinion as those heretics just mentioned: let him be anathema.
As a result of this condemnation, the writings of
Origen supporting his teachings in these areas were destroyed. They
were either outright destroyed, or they were translated with the
appropriate adjustments to eliminate conflict with Orthodox
Christianity (the "Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church" referred to
in the council of 553, which at the time included both of what are
now called the Catholic and Orthodox Churches). Therefore, little
direct evidence remains to fully confirm or disprove Origen’s
support of the nine points of anathema against him.
The book Reincarnation in Christianity, by the
theosophist Geddes
MacGregor (1978) asserted that Origen believed in reincarnation. MacGregor
is convinced that Origen believed in and taught about reincarnation
but that his texts written about the subject have been destroyed.
He admits that there is no extant proof for that position. The
allegation was also repeated by Shirley
MacLaine in her book Out On a Limb.
This cannot be confirmed from the existent
writings of Origen. He was cognizant of the concept of
reincarnation (metensomatosis "re-embodiment" in his words) from
Greek philosophy, but it is repeatedly stated that this concept is
no part of the Christian teaching or scripture. In his Comment on
the Gospel of
Matthew, which stems from a sixth century Latin translation, it
is written: "In this place [when Jesus said Elijah was come and
referred to John the Baptist] it does not appear to me that by
Elijah the soul is spoken of, lest I fall into the doctrine of
transmigration, which is foreign to the Church of God, and not
handed down by the apostles, nor anywhere set forth in the
scriptures" (ibid., 13:1:46–53 ).
The Emperor Justinian chose
the theory of eternal damnation over Apokatastasis and the
underlying need for purification of all souls through multiple
incarnations. Origenes der Diamantene
Reluctantly he remains a father of the church, and this can be seen
best in the commentaries of Tyrannius
Rufinus, who visibly struggled with his task of transcribing
Origen’s works into Latin and the new Roman dogma and made
extensive changes to the original text. Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans Books
6-10
His thought on the Old Testament was an important
link in the development of the medieval system of Typology.
See also
Sources
- Bostock, Gerald (2003), Origen: The Alternative to Augustine?, The Expository Times, Vol.114; p327-332, DOI: 10.1177/001452460311401001
- Trigg, JW (1985), Origen: The Bible and Philosophy in the third-century church, SCM Press (London), ISBN 978-0334022343
- Trigg, JW (1998), Origen (Early Church Fathers), Routledge, ISBN 978-0415118361
- Crouzel, Henri (1989), Origen: The Life and Thought of the First Great Theologian, HarperCollins, ISBN 0060616326
References
Resource
- Pelikan, Jaroslav. The Emergence of the Catholic Tradition: 100-600. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.
Modern Uses of the Name
- Origen aka Will Stanton is the name of an indie/hip-hop artist in Pittsburgh, PA
- origenxbox360
- Origen Financial LLC
- Origen is a medical device manufacturer in Austin, TX
- Origen ae HTPC enclosure manufacturer
- Origen Therapeutics is a biotechnology company in California, USA
- Origen Group is a consultancy company in London, UK
External links
- Translations
- Translations of Origen's writing can be found in Ante-Nicene Fathers or in The Fathers of the Church.
- Early Christian Writings - Origen
- Analysis and Criticism
- Derivative Summaries
- Catholic Encyclopedia: Origen and Origenism
- Origen Entry in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Origen in the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica
- Jewish Encyclopedia: Origen
- Origen from New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge
- Bibliography
- EarlyChurch.org.uk Extensive bibliography and on-line articles.
origen in Arabic: أوريجانوس
origen in Bulgarian: Ориген
origen in Catalan: Orígenes
origen in Czech: Órigenés
origen in Danish: Origenes
origen in German: Origenes
origen in Estonian: Origenes
origen in Modern Greek (1453-): Ωριγένης
origen in Spanish: Orígenes
origen in Esperanto: Origeno
origen in French: Origène
origen in Western Frisian: Origenes
origen in Galician: Oríxenes
origen in Korean: 오리게네스
origen in Croatian: Origen
origen in Indonesian: Origenes
origen in Interlingua (International Auxiliary
Language Association): Origen
origen in Italian: Origene Adamantio
origen in Hebrew: אוריגנס
origen in Latin: Origenes
origen in Lithuanian: Origenas
origen in Hungarian: Órigenész
origen in Malayalam: ഒരിജന്
origen in Dutch: Origenes
origen in Japanese: オリゲネス
origen in Norwegian: Origenes
origen in Polish: Orygenes
origen in Portuguese: Orígenes
origen in Romanian: Origene
origen in Russian: Ориген
origen in Slovak: Origenes
origen in Serbian: Ориген
origen in Finnish: Origenes
origen in Swedish: Origenes
origen in Ukrainian: Ориген
origen in Chinese: 俄利根